Showing posts with label huffington post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label huffington post. Show all posts

Wednesday 15 June 2011

Area 51 Scientist Speaks Out - Human Alien Collaboration



Scientist David Adair talks about propulsion at the speed of light technology in the early 70's. This is a mind blowing interview that isn't about alien blowjobs. I used the visual to get your attention. It's not really about collaboration either as back engineered technology is seemingly secured by groups who don't answer to the people.

This is an interesting interview. I've been noting the topic of scientific divine inspiration for a couple of years now and David Adair confirms here, the technology ideas were coming to him in his dreams. 

So that's Descartes, Francis Bacon, Tesla and now Adair all taking other world inspiration including 'angelic' visits not to mention Francis Crick's inspiration from mystical LSD. Today's scientists are smoking crack pipes and clinging on to the illusion of empiricism and materialism if they refuse to recognise where the sizzle is coming from.

Wednesday 15 August 2007

Commercial Break


Quite a few of you have asked me about the signature I use on my email and where its from. I found it on Pajamas media which is a U.S. right wing blogging syndicate that I read. Many might be surprised that The Huffington Post or The Daily Kos isn't content that is more reflective of my political leanings towards Socialism. I love that word Socialist, it gets right up the noses of those who shriek at the word Liberal.

I read these right wing blogs mainly because the content is invariably material that I disagree with - but that doesn't mean always. My political mentor and close friend taught me the value of this exercise a few years back. As hard as I tried I couldn't win any political arguments with him as he was well versed in the hypocrisy of the both the left as well as the right (if those terms mean anything anymore). I fondly recall him saying that both sides wanted to tax the living hell out of him and just spend it differently.

Its my view that planners should able to cut through subjectivity and aim for objectivity by understanding the arguments and not the sentiments. Interestingly I've found that the picture above is deeply ambiguous depending on who reads it, as is the title of this post. Any thoughts?